Saturday, March 24, 2007

Predatory Lending: What to Look Out For As You Search for a Home

The weather is better, more people are looking to buy homes. Caution please, about the type of loan you get. Specifically, avoid predatory lenders. Here are some tips about what to watch out for:

*Someone tries to get you to buy a home for more than it is worth based upon an inflated or false appraisal. You can help avoid this by working with a real estate professional who can provide you with real comps. Not to downplay the Internet appraisal models like Zillow, but, a Realtor® in the trenches can get you the best, updated information about home sales in a particular area.

*A lender is a predator if they are knowingly lending more money to you than you can repay, lending more than 100% of the value of the loan, or charging high fees in connection with a loan. You can help ensure you make a wise loan decision by talking to at least three mortgage lenders. You can weigh what all three tell you. And keep in mind, going with the one that seems to promise you the moon may not be wise: if it seems too good to be true, it probably is.

*If a mortgage lender encourages you to falsify any information (yearly salary, etc) in order to qualify for the loan, be wary and seek another lender. Mortgage fraud is not good. Note: do you look good in prison orange?

*The home you want to buy looks a lot like others sold in the area, in similar condition, but someone wants you to pay a lot more for the home than the others. This may sound like the first point, but it's a tad different. There may not be an appraisal involved. Make sure a qualified professional advises you on home sales so you can make a wise decision.

*You are asked to sign blank documents, with people telling you the details will be filled in later. This may sound like a no brainer, but believe me, it happens.

*Someone writes up a purchase agreement for a home, and it has an addendum stating that the Seller will be holding a second mortgage which will be 'forgiven' by the Seller immediately upon your taking Title to the home. This is a big red flag. It means someone is inflating the price of the house - and someone is getting the difference in the real price of the house and the inflated price - that someone should not be you, a broker, a lender or an appraiser. It's fraud.

*You are told that your only chance of getting a loan will be through this one lender. Now I know the American Dream is to own a home. But, if only one mortgage lender in the World will qualify you to get a mortgage....it probably should make you think: is this really the right time for me to buy, or should I wait and save money, clear up my credit, first? And of course if you have checked with other mortgage lenders as I stated above, you will have a better idea about whether now is the right time for you to consider buying a home.

I may be a Realtor® and yes I only make money if people buy or sell homes. However, I need to be able to sleep at night! Those of us who are true professionals only want you to buy a home when you are ready, willing and able. On that note, if you have concerns and know you cannot buy a home now, but want to figure out a strategy so that sometime in the future you CAN buy a home, let me know. There are financial counselors, free of charge, who will work with you for a year (in the mortgage 'arm' of my company) so that you can begin to get your finances on track. Here is an article from The New Standard written by Michelle Chen, about Ohio's Predatory Lending Laws. Peace Out - 3C

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Euclid Corridor Project Discussed at Cleveland's City Hall Today

The Euclid Corridor Project was analyzed today at City Hall; progress was discussed. Did you know that the Silver Line Transportation Plan of RTA is expected to entice 56,000 new jobs to Cleveland - there will be 36 stops, sidewalks, trees; you can check out the Silver Line Plans. What do you think? Construction begins between E 55th and E. 83rd street this Thursday. This is the Cleve. State Univ. report on the project and the fact that the Corridor is one of the Oral History Art Project sites to be developed. These are all of the sites for 'audio' oral histories: Public Square; E. 9th; Playhouse Square; E. 19th; E. 40th; E. 59th; between E. 60th and E. 90th (TBD); E. 93rd; Adelbert Road – University Circle; Ford-Euclid – University Circle.

This has been in the works for a while. Here is a press release issued by Senator Voinovich in 2003.

Here are some maps/renderings of the Project from the Silver Line (RTA) site.

Peace Out - 3C

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Walmart Withdraws Banking Idea....Do We Have a Double Standard or Not?

I've written a few posts on Walmart and Steelyard Commons. One of the posts led to comments on Walmart's efforts to get further into the banking business. (you will have to read the comments to get this banking thread)

I'm not a huge Walmart fan, I think it's great that they are not taking the tax abatement for their Steelyard Commons location; I think it's great they are doing some community (commercial) programs in several states (including Ohio) that will supposedly help small businesses near Walmart. But getting into banking - other than providing ATM services or check cashing as other retailers do, seemed like the fox guarding the chicken coop to me. I do have a slight twist on this thought though. Apparently Target already has similar banking services to the type of service Walmart sought.

Pat Combs, President of the National Assn of Realtors® had an official comment on Walmart's withdrawal of it's efforts to increase it's banking services. She talks about how mixing finance and commerce is a bad idea for our country. I can't help but feel that even though Target and Lowe's may be 'better neighbors' (and I agree), it's still a double standard no?! I suspect Walmart would have had a strong case if they had continued in this effort, or, that Target and others with the increased banking items, might have lost theirs?

Someone may be able to help me understand why there is a difference here. Peace Out - 3C

Helpful Phone Numbers?


Browsing through any of the neighborhood redevelopment corporation websites is uesful. Today I was on the Kamms Corner site. They have a terrific list of useful telephone numbers -

Kind of a timely link here, since we have talked about predatory lending which can lead to foreclosures.

And maybe the best link; if you are worried about making your mortgage payments, DO NOT WAIT until it's too late to try to resolve the issue. Two things to do.

Peace Out - 3C

Cuyahoga County: West Side Condo/Town House Sales for March 2007

My last post dealt with single family home sale activity in March 2007. This is the condo side of the report, for the same zip code areas:
  • Data includes condo sale activity through local brokerages and our computer system (MLS)

  • Data covers condo sales from March 1, 2007 to the present

Rocky River 44116:

2 condos under contract

1 sold

Lakewood 44107:

1 condo under contract

1 sold

Cleveland's West Side 44135 none under contract, none sold

Cleveland's West Side 44111 none under contract, none sold

*Note: there are fewer condo communities in both of the two above zip codes

Cleveland's West Side: 44102:

1 condo under contract

1 condo sold

Cleveland's West Side: 44113:

3 condos under contract

1 condo sold

Peace Out - 3C

Single Family Home Sales: Cleveland's West Side, Lakewood and Rocky River



It's the weekend and time for an update on home sales. This is a 'single family' home report, by zip code, for a few of our west side communities:

  • Data includes homes sold through brokerages

  • Data from March 1, 2007 to the present.

Rocky River 44116

1 home under contract

6 homes sold

Lakewood 44107

6 homes went under contract

17 homes sold

Cleveland's West Side 44135

1 home under contract

12 homes sold

Cleveland's West Side 44111

5 homes under contract

9 homes sold

Cleveland's West Side 44102

1 home under contract

6 homes sold

Cleveland's West Side 44113

2 homes under contract

none sold in March (yet!)

Peace Out - 3C



Friday, March 16, 2007

Predatory Lending History and Issues Discussed by Professor Kathleen Engel at 'Meet The Bloggers' Coffee House Discussion

Gypsy Coffee House in Cleveland's West Side was the scene of a fascinating and lively discussion and was a 'Meet the Bloggers Event'. I had another meeting and left before I was able to get all the blog info from participants but people like Jeff of YellowDogSammy and George of BrewedFreshDaily were there among others. A shout out to the organizers of this event. Manager Mark and I were very pleased to be at this informative session.

The focus was on predatory lending and Kathleen Engel, esteemed Professor at Cleveland's Marshall Law School was our guest. We've heard a lot about predatory lending and like all of you, the practice makes my blood boil. Kathleen Engel and a colleague, Patricia McCoy (Law Professor at University of Connecticut) have written a wonderful paper called Turning a Blind Eye. It's well worth the read. Professor Engel was instrumental in working and initiating the predatory lending laws proposed for Cuyahoga County.

Why are we in this mess and what does it all mean? Synopsis according to Professor Engel: Once upon a time, if you wanted a loan, you provided proof that you could make loan payments. You were given a loan based on what you could afford to pay each month on the loan.

These loans were 'prime' loans or standard loans. There were FHA and VA loans which could be considered sub prime because people can get those loans with no money down, but what happened (I think in the 80s) was the rise of a private, conventional sub prime loan market.

This was a 'make money for Wall Street' idea, to put it in simple terms. Entrepreneurial (to be kind) financial types decided loans could be sold on the open market so that the original loan holders no longer had a stake in the outcomes. Ms. homeowner gets a loan from one company and before you know it, her loan payment forms are changing names faster than you can say 'sold on the open market'. I remember loans like that, as a homeowner in Maryland.

Anyway, Kathleen Engel focused on fiduciary responsibility, or in other terms, the loan providers legal and moral responsibility and to whom. When you get a prime loan that stays in house, or with the person you bought the loan from, they have a responsibility to you AND their own lending institution. Once the loan is sold, that loan just becomes a commodity in a sub prime market and their responsibility is only to their shareholders. Can you see why we got into this mess?

Now we have people with 125% loans (PLEASE do not ever get a loan like that) in a market where your home is not worth 125% of it's original sale price.

And when the loan payment becomes too high - because really you should have waited a year or two to save money and not GET a 125% loan - you want to sell your house and then don't understand why it can't be listed and sold at a price that matches your mortgage.

To me it's almost like a bait and switch program. But those in the field are much more adept at explaining this than I am. So read Turning a Blind Eye.

Interestingly enough, Brian Brady, one of my pals and fellow bloggers, is a mortgage lender and an insightful one at that. He has a fantastic post explaining this scenario in detail. It's called Bad Loans Buried in the Back of the Breadbox and also explains how we got into this mess.

What's the answer? Save your money and buy a home the old fashioned way: when you can afford it? Or at least keep in the back of your head: if it seems to good to be true, it probably is.

Peace Out - 3C